Monthly Archives: December 2010

Memo to Newsnight editors: give your guests a chance to speak!

Successful media performers usually combine instant availability ( don’t these people have lives to live, work to do, children to feed, elderly relatives to take care of????) with the ability to get their point across in a naturalistic way; neither too concise, nor too rambling. Too short an answer and you risk looking like Clement Atlee, the post war Labour leader, about whom one BBC producer said, ‘Feeding questions to Clem is like throwing a dog a biscuit.’

It’s a fine art, there’s no doubt about it, and much harder than it looks. From the odd discussion I have taken part in over the years, I have learned a few things, particularly the importance of deciding beforehand what broad points I want to make plus learning to answer at greater length than possibly feels natural.

Even so, I was quite shocked to discover, while watching myself take part in a recent pre recorded TV discussion, that, while I had made my points reasonably well and not too briefly, all the other (male) panellists spoke at three times the length. In short, they just kept….. talking and talking……..elaborating on their argument and were allowed to do so by the female presenter whereas each time I finished making my first main point, she immediately looked over to one of the men to gauge their response.That meant I had to interrupt her or one of them in order to get my fair share of time.

Put another way, a lot of these debates suit a certain kind of insensitive smug masculine thruster (and a few women fit this description); the person who is convinced his point is not just more important than everyone’s else’s but really, the only point worth making; a self starter who will happily answer his own questions, cut other people short and generally speak with a smooth authority that can come across as instrinsically demeaning to more impassioned or less confident speakers.

Body language comes into it too; there is a way of sitting rock still, without moving a muscle or turning-towards, a failure to engage with other participants that suggests outright dismissal of their contribution.

This is exactly what happened to Sarah Churchwell, the academic, on Newsnight last night , during a discussion on university tuition fees. Churchwell appeared with David Starkey and the historian and the MP Tristram Hunt, both of whom were given ample time to make their argument.…

Latest writing

THE CRISIS OF THE MERITOCRACY

The crisis of the meritocracy: Britain’s transition to mass education since the Second World War

PETER MANDLER, 2020

Oxford: Oxford University Press

361pp, hardback, £25, ISBN 9780198840145

Cambridge historian Peter Mandler has a fundamentally optimistic story to tell about the growth of universal education in Britain over the last seventy years and one can sense his stubborn resistance to any more sceptical interpretation on almost every page of this dense and impressive history. Since the close of the ‘people’s war’ in 1945, Mandler argues, we have witnessed the rise of mass education, initially at secondary level, and more recently in higher education where participation rates currently nudge New Labour’s much vaunted promise of 50 per cent. Contrary to established narratives that have put this development down to economic growth or significant pieces of legislation, Mandler identifies the expansion of educational opportunity as the result of a constantly shifting interplay of demand and supply that has reinforced ‘the deepening compact between the individual citizen and the state which came with formal democracy and the idea of equal citizenship’. Education continues to be seen by the public as one of the ‘decencies’ of life’; hence the inexorable rise in demand for what Mandler often refers to as ‘more and better’.

In short, the people (sort of) did it themselves.

On the face of it, this is an attractive proposition, yet one that is oddly tricky to grapple with, given the mass of contradictory or partial information available to us concerning what the ‘people’ have wanted at any given historical moment or, indeed, who exactly the people are. Mandler deliberately employs ‘a promiscuous array of methods and sources’, sifting through realms of evidence from official publications, interviews, academic studies, pollsters’ findings and demographic surveys in an attempt to clarify the complex relationship between government policy, public demand and social change. This promiscuity encourages him to prosecute his subsidiary critique of the alleged tendency of academic disciplines to work in unhelpful silos. Economists and social scientists, he charges, have paid scant attention to educational expansion while educationists and political historians tend to ‘chop up long-term trends into short political segments’ with many on the left falling into a ‘declinist narrative’ in which the failures of a ‘divided’ Labour party feature heavily as a reason for a lack of genuine progress (an analysis Mandler anyway rejects). But we shall return to the problem of we whingeing progressives in a moment.…

Latest news & events

A Cold War Tragedy

Melissa will be in conversation with Anne Sebba about her new book, ‘Ethel Rosenberg – A Cold War Tragedy.’

Weds 15th September 2021, 5-6pm, in the Robert Graves Tent at the Wimbledon Book Festival.

More information here.

 …