Putting the special back into special needs.

I can still vividly remember Michael Gove’s first speech to the House of Commons as Secretary of State for Education in 2010. A blast of oratory in which he charged the outgoing New Labour government of failing poor children with talent.

During Labour’s 13 years in office, Gove thundered, on average only 45 children on free school meals had won a place at Oxford or Cambridge – a ‘shameful record’.

In the decade since then, this theme of social mobility has continued to dominate public and political debates regarding the success, or otherwise, of our school system.

But what about the educational experiences of the many hundreds and thousands of young people not considered conventional ‘winners’, particularly those with SEND? Here, the debates become rather more muted and evasive.

Most politicians talk the talk of inclusion, but their rhetoric sits uneasily with the decade-long drive to increase exam results come what may, and the overhaul of SEND funding that took place in 2014 amid the swingeing cuts of the austerity years.

Things have worsened still in the wake of COVID-19. A recent poll of a thousand parents highlighted a ‘widespread failure’ to restore SEND provision when children returned to school in September 2020, leaving a ‘sizeable’ proportion of SEND children unable to return to school at all.

Yet there are some bright spots on the horizon. The issue of SEND provision in English schools is increasingly coming under the spotlight, thanks to a form of parental campaigning that’s much louder than before, more effective and better at shaping the debate and shaming policymakers.

In 2018/19, the Education Select Committee looked at SEND provision in what was one of the longest and most wide-ranging inquiries ever undertaken by a Select Committee, receiving over 700 submissions in the process.

According to Committee Chair Robert Halfon, the resulting report showed up how, “Families continue to face a treacle of bureaucracy, a postcode lottery of provision, buck-passing and confusion in a system that breeds conflict.”

Another new book Young People on the Margins, edited by Loic Menzies and Sam Baars from the Centre for Education and Youth ( my review to be published soon) highlights six discrete categories of students, including those with special needs, who have been marginalised over the past decades: their specific needs and circumstances misunderstood or neglected by a system needing to prove its ‘high standards’ in narrow terms.

But we mustn’t forget those on the frontline – the skilled and experienced practitioners continually developing new approaches to learning. The central argument of Clare Ward and James Galpin’s inspirational new book, The Anxiety Workbook for Supporting Teens who Learn Differently, is that uncertainty lies at the root of many difficulties for neurodiverse teens.

Ward and Galpin gently remind us that understanding this takes us to the heart of the common human experience; we all struggle with existential uncertainty, now more than ever.

A new book by Adele Bates, Miss, I Don’t Give a Sh*t, meanwhile offers lively guidance from an expert in behaviour management.

Bates is a sharp critic of mass school exclusions and an advocate of setting clear boundaries, but also stresses the importance of understanding what lies behind the difficulties exhibited by troubled teens – be it hunger, or an unstable and unhappy home life.

Again, given the disruptions of the past year, wider society is now more receptive to such approaches.

Bates also stresses the necessity of putting in place the right sort of support in schools. For this, we could look to Finland, where every classroom has a full complement of teachers ( many educated to Masters level) who possess a deep understanding of the full spectrum of special needs.

Finland is no utopia, but we can certainly learn from its measured approach to the inevitability of difference among children. The Finnish experience further encourages us to develop a different narrative around what a successful school system might actually look like – one in which there’s room to celebrate, rather than merely manage difference.

Michael Gove was right to claim that our school system lets down too many children, but his ambitions were too limited, too narrowly focussed on a select few. We’ll never truly flourish as a nation until we have an education system that genuinely nurtures the many kinds of intelligence possessed by our young people – not just the ‘Oxbridge kind’.

An earlier version of this piece was published in Teach Secondary magazine in April 2021.

Natural Born Rebel

History loves nothing more than a beautiful heroine battling for a just cause. For the past 100 years, Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst have been fixed in the collective mind as glamorous symbols of the protracted struggle for votes for women. In contrast, Sylvia, the second daughter of this remarkable family, remains, according to Rachel Holmes,… Continue reading…

How the UK government is ‘settling scores’ with unions by axing crucial union learning fund

Ann McKelvey enjoys her job as a cover supervisor at the Co-op academy, a secondary school in Leeds. She loves the school, where she has been since 2013, and working with young people, but deep down she has always wanted to be a teacher. “The problem was I didn’t have A-levels,” she says. “And I… Continue reading…

Mass Covid testing in England’s schools

Mass Covid testing in England’s schools

Mass Covid testing at the drop of a hat is the latest bad idea for England’s schools After the exams fiasco, a plan to turn schools into test centres shows politicians have still not learned to listen to teachers Schools returning in January must provide for mass testing of pupils. Photograph: Christopher Thomond/The Guardian Mon… Continue reading…

From the archive: the truth about (many) writers’ incomes

This piece was first published in Mslexia magazine in March 2017, but it is still relevant today. Click on the link below to read it. MSLEXIA MARCH 2017 copy Continue reading…

How to lift a heart: the joy in protest and seeking political change

How do you define or promote something as elusive as happiness? Most of us might tick the box marked “cheerful” on Wednesday morning but could well consider ourselves crashingly miserable come Sunday afternoon. And suppose we can empirically establish contentment over a longish period, how do we unpick the underlying reasons for it? A happy… Continue reading…

From the archive: A Class Act

He’s a good storyteller, Ambalavaner Sivanandan, and he tells a particularly good story about the Lost Missionary: a few years ago, a confused old man kept ringing the Institute of Race Relations, of which Sivanandan is the director, but nobody knew what he wanted. The caller muttered something about wanting to help people, to give… Continue reading…

Contentious claims in Tory manifesto promise

There was something almost sci-fi about the Conservative manifesto launch. A sea of cabinet ministers, packed into what looked like a cross between a cattle shed and a car park, dressed in various shades of blue, listening to the navy-clad prime minister intone on her favourite themes of this election. Strong and stable with everything,… Continue reading…

How to make the world a better place

The announcement of the general election coincides with the 50th anniversary of the May Day Manifesto. Here left thinkers and writers have their say on what a 2017 version of the famous manifesto might look like. Terry Eagleton: ‘As a 24-year-old Cambridge academic, I was lucky enough to be involved in the writing of the… Continue reading…

Women and power: what now?

In a recent lecture the Cambridge classicist Mary Beard cogently argued that public ­attitudes to women in power have altered frighteningly little over the centuries. Even though there has been a shift as a minority of women have climbed to positions of greater public and corporate influence over the past few decades, the hostile treatment… Continue reading…